The UK’s Crackdown on Crypto ATMs
A Warning for the Industry
Regulation always lags behind innovation. It’s been the pattern with every major financial disruption, from the early days of online banking to the explosion of fintech startups. Cryptocurrency, with its promise of decentralization and financial autonomy, has pushed that tension to new extremes. Governments and regulators are still trying to catch up, trying to draw boundaries around something that was never designed to be contained.
This week, the UK sent a clear message: crypto businesses that operate outside the law won’t just be fined—they’ll face real consequences. Olumide Osunkoya, a London-based entrepreneur, became the first person in the country to be sentenced for running unregistered cryptocurrency ATMs. His network of machines processed more than £2.5 million in transactions before authorities shut them down, and now he’s looking at four years in prison.
For some, this is just another example of regulatory overreach. For others, it’s a long-overdue step in bringing cryptocurrency into a legitimate financial framework. Either way, it’s a turning point in how governments are approaching crypto infrastructure.
The Rise of Crypto ATMs: A Wild West Economy
Crypto ATMs were supposed to bridge the gap between digital and physical currency. The concept is simple—insert cash, buy cryptocurrency, and have it sent directly to your wallet. Some machines even allow you to sell crypto for cash. They popped up in convenience stores, gas stations, and shopping centers, offering a fast, easy way for people to enter the crypto market without having to navigate the complexities of exchanges or online wallets.
For many users, these machines provided something that traditional exchanges lacked—anonymity. There’s no lengthy verification process, no need to connect a bank account. Just cash in, crypto out. And that’s exactly what made them a target for regulators.
Authorities have long suspected that unregulated crypto ATMs are being used for money laundering, fraud, and other illicit activities. Without proper oversight, it’s impossible to track where the money is coming from or where it’s going. And in the world of finance, that kind of opacity is an open invitation for crime.
Osunkoya’s Downfall: A Case Study in Crypto Regulation
Osunkoya’s case wasn’t just about a single machine or a one-time lapse in compliance. He operated a full network of unregistered ATMs, funneling millions of pounds through them without obtaining the necessary approvals from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
The FCA had already made its position clear: crypto ATM operators must be registered and must comply with anti-money laundering regulations. The agency had issued multiple warnings, sent enforcement teams to seize illegal machines, and made it known that businesses failing to comply would be shut down.
Osunkoya’s machines were first discovered in 2023, when the FCA, working with local police, conducted a series of inspections targeting crypto ATMs. His machines lacked the required regulatory approvals, and after an investigation, authorities charged him with operating an unlicensed money service business. The four-year sentence handed down this week marks the first time anyone in the UK has faced prison time for this type of offense.
A Sign of What’s to Come
One case doesn’t make a trend, but it does set a precedent. This ruling signals that the UK is ready to move beyond fines and warnings when it comes to crypto enforcement.
The FCA has been ramping up its oversight of the crypto sector for years. In 2021, it introduced new rules requiring all crypto firms to register and comply with anti-money laundering regulations. Many companies struggled—or refused—to meet the new requirements, leading the FCA to reject or suspend numerous applications. Crypto ATMs, largely operating in a legal gray area, became a particular focus of enforcement efforts.
Now, with this first prison sentence handed down, it’s clear that authorities are no longer interested in simply shutting down machines. They’re going after operators.
This is a shift that mirrors what’s happening in other parts of the world. The United States, Canada, and European Union have all taken steps to increase oversight on crypto ATMs, viewing them as potential risks for financial crimes. In the US, regulators have seized hundreds of machines tied to fraud and illegal transactions. Canada now requires all crypto ATMs to register with its financial watchdog, FINTRAC.
For the UK, Osunkoya’s case is likely just the beginning. The FCA has identified more than 100 unregistered crypto ATMs across the country, and enforcement actions are expected to continue. The question now is whether this crackdown will push crypto ATM operators toward compliance or drive them further underground.
What This Means for Crypto’s Future
Crypto regulation has always been a balancing act. Too little oversight, and you create an environment ripe for fraud and financial crime. Too much regulation, and you risk stifling innovation and pushing legitimate businesses out of the market.
Crypto ATMs, for all their regulatory challenges, serve a real purpose. They provide access to digital assets for people who may not have bank accounts, who may not trust online exchanges, or who simply prefer the simplicity of cash transactions. Removing them entirely wouldn’t just hurt criminals—it would hurt everyday users who rely on them.
But regulation is inevitable. The industry has reached a point where governments can no longer ignore it, and the rules that apply to traditional finance are now being applied to crypto as well. The difference is that crypto was built on the idea of decentralization, of removing intermediaries, of operating outside the traditional banking system. Now, it’s being asked to play by the same rules.
For businesses in the space, this means adaptation is no longer optional. Crypto ATMs that want to survive will need to comply with registration requirements, implement identity verification, and follow anti-money laundering laws. Exchanges, wallets, and other crypto services will face increasing scrutiny as well.
For users, it means that some of the convenience and anonymity that once defined crypto may start to fade. The ability to walk up to a machine, insert cash, and walk away with Bitcoin—no questions asked—might soon be a thing of the past.
The sentencing of Olumide Osunkoya is more than just a single legal case. It’s a warning shot. Governments around the world are taking crypto regulation seriously, and enforcement is no longer just about shutting down businesses—it’s about holding individuals accountable.
This moment represents a shift in how cryptocurrency is treated, from something that operated in its own separate space to something that is now being pulled into the traditional financial system. Whether that’s good or bad depends on who you ask.
One thing is certain: the days of crypto operating in a regulatory gray area are coming to an end. The industry is changing, and those who don’t change with it risk finding themselves on the wrong side of the law.
